Digital literacy has been defined
as “using digital technology, communications tools, and/or networks to access,
manage, integrate, evaluate, and create information in order to function in a
knowledge society” (ETS, 2007), they called it ICT literacy. Some others
defined digital literacy in terms of those capabilities required to live, learn
and work in a digital, knowledge or information society. This post is aimed at briefly
discussing one of the elements of digital literacy, which is very important for
one’s career prospects even though it is neglected by many. Jisc (2014) identified
7 elements of digital literacy as follows: media literacy; communications and
collaboration; career and identity management; ICT literacy; learning skills;
digital scholarship and information literacy.
The focus here is on career and
identity management. This is because many people inadvertently and significantly harm
their job prospects through the content they post online - one’s online
presence matters to employers. Times have changed and so did the world, we are
living in a world where what you do online could make or break your career.
Even what we post as private content may become public as big company after big company
fall victim of hacking. Think of what happened when Ashley Madison’s presumed
safe and secure ‘Adultery Website’ was hacked – millions of cheating married
men and women became exposed with serious consequences for many.
One should therefore manage his
digital identity (online presence) both on social and professional networks
properly, particularly Facebook and LinkedIn. Neglecting a healthy online
presence is increasingly becoming an unacceptable career risk, but it is
important that your personal and professional information are consistent across
all platforms and devoid of anything that could vitiate your chances of being
hired by an employer privy to such information.
According to the annual CareerBuilder
social media recruitment survey, 35% of employers are less likely to interview
applicants they can’t find online, and majority of employers (52% in 2015, 43%
in 2014 and 39% in 2013) now use social networks to screen candidates. The 2015
CareerBuilder – Harris polls of more than 2000 US HR managers across various industries
revealed that, “Researching
candidates via social media and other online sources has transformed from an
emerging trend to a staple of online recruitment… In a competitive job
market, recruiters are looking for all the information they can find that might
help them make decisions.” The full report of the survey can be accessed
online via http://www.careerbuilder.co.uk/share/aboutus/pressreleasesdetail.aspx?sd=5%2F14%2F2015&id=pr893&ed=12%2F31%2F2015
The survey further revealed employers’ turn-offs in the following
order: provocative or inappropriate
photographs (46%); information about candidate drinking or using drugs (40%); candidate
bad-mouthed previous company or fellow employee (34%); Poor communication
skills (30%) and discriminatory comments related to race, religion, gender, etc.
(29%). The report may not
exactly reflect what is currently happening in Nigeria, but it is a matter of
time, perhaps within a few years Nigerian employers will import what is
increasingly becoming conventional practice in US and European job market.
BBC survey suggests that only
about 40% of youth (probably in UK) knows that the personal information they
shared online stays online forever. The figures could be worse in developing
countries. The implication is that many people, oblivious of the permanent
nature of their online content will continue to post carelessly and occasionally
committing what may be akin to ‘career suicide’.
In the subsequent posts, cases of
career disastrous online content/activities will be highlighted, curriculum
implications, online brand building, online safety and entrepreneurial angle will be discussed. Please keep checking
every week and feel free leave a comment on my posts. Thank you for reading.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThere are two sides to every coin which means that both good and bad exist and travels side by side. Little do employees know that their activities on line can affect their jobs. Although we know that
ReplyDeleteemployees are required to be of good behaviours within and outside their work place. In this context, can we say that technology or ICT have done more harm than good ?
This is indeed a very wonderful piece i must confess in the sense that it really x-rayed the relationship between digital identity (online presence) and carreer prospects. It also draws attention of many to the importance of maintaining a healthy and uniform online presence.
ReplyDeleteThis article is helpful and will opened the masses eyes to know what to post online for whatever they post online can make or break them. Thanks a lot Paulinus for job well done and remain blessed.
ReplyDeleteThis article is helpful and will opened the masses eyes to know what to post online for whatever they post online can make or break them. Thanks a lot Paulinus for job well done and remain blessed.
ReplyDeleteI will comment further on this post. Thus, what is possible US might not work in Nigeria. For example the employees on line screening which is widely used in developed countries to reduce the number of applicants. I will opine that employers in Nigeria will most likely drop this approach because it will militate against bribe. So therefore, face to face interview will prevail over online screening because it will generate more money (bribe). Owing to this, what happened two years ago in Nigeria would have not happened if online screening was adopted. Thus, so many people applicants were invited to Abuja for job screening exercise. The stadium was filled to its capacity to the extend that so many young graduates dropped dead with their files. I have loads to say in this context but I will stop here.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. But even in US, those who screen candidate online use it as a starting point before it gets to face-to-face interview stage. So online screening is just preliminary stage of the hiring process
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree with you and this also reflected in my view.My point here is this : because people like to take bribe in Nigeria, adopting the online screening will affect their income. The elephants in the house will not allow the online system of Job screening to survive. They would rather prefer to see the applicants or candidates to Bargain. That is my point. In this context, corruption will militate against online screening.
ReplyDeleteNigeria
ReplyDeleteRead more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/03/immigration-tragedy-dead-candidates-get-3-job-slots/
Nigeria
ReplyDeleteRead more at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/03/immigration-tragedy-dead-candidates-get-3-job-slots/
People that use online screening are those who have the interest of their organisation at heart and what to hire best candidates for the Job. I will soon post part two of this in which I will provide links to those who were fired for what they posted online. You are making a point by highlighting how corruption will make importation of online screen culture difficult. However, the focus here is on the applicant and employee who need to be careful with what they post.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes you are correct. I am only reflecting on paragraph 4 empirical data.
ReplyDeleteIn general the awareness that is your focus is perfect. Hopefully, Nigerians will learn from this. please also include the case of employee getting into trouble in Nigeria due to careless posting. This will help sensitise more people
ReplyDelete